[mapguide-internals] RFC 81 is ready for review

[Jackie Ng]

There's no point in having redundant functionality. This RFC seems to cover
RFC 71 and more. I have no qualms about suspending/cancelling my work on RFC
71.

- Jackie


Buddy Hu wrote:
> 
> Hi Kenneth, Thanks for your reply!
> 
> About the overlap with RFC 71, I think we don't make any changes to the
> existing Selection Panel. If Jackie want to introduce the Selection Panel
> to the AJAX view, I am pleasure to see this happens. If not, I think the
> Feature Inspector panel will cover some functionalities of the Selection
> Panel.
> 
> For the typo of "Inverse Selection", I will update it later. Thanks for
> your good catch.
> 
> And I don't think we need any server or Webserver code changes for this
> RFC. I will clarify these in the "Implications" part.
> 
> And I'm not intent to support the sort or filter for the properties now.
> 
> For the Gzip, we get this suggestion from Paul Spencer. I didn't do any
> test for this yet. For more details, you can check the mail I attached.
> 
> Thanks for your reply again! I will update my RFC and post it again.
> 
> -Buddy
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Kenneth
> Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 4:04 PM
> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
> Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RFC 81 is ready for review
> 
> This overlaps a bit with RFC 71:
> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc71
> 
> At least the tree for display in the AJAX viewer should be present 
> there, and I belive Jackie has developed this already?
> 
> There is a slight spelling error in the "Inverse selection" menu item.
> 
> Are there any changes required in the server code, or is this done with 
> the current selection system?
> 
> There has been questions about the order of properties, some want them 
> sorted, some want them as is, will there be an option to select sort
> modus?
> 
> To use GZip compression, is it possible to just serve the .gz file or 
> does it require a webserver change to supply the compression header?
> I seem to recal that some browsers do not support GZip compression, and 
> the served file should obey the compression flag to ensure compatibility.
> 
> If a webserver change is required, will the change include maintenance 
> for the installer?
> 
> The test plan should include testing with a range of browsers.
> 
> I am overall positive, the preview looks cool, and the addition is 
> sorely needed.
> 
> Regards, Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S
> 
> 
> 
> Buddy Hu skrev:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> The RFC 81- Add a new widget Feature Inspector is ok for review.
>> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc81
>> Any comments will be appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Buddy Hu
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>   
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/RFC-81-is-ready-for-review-tp3485127p3504295.html
Sent from the MapGuide Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.