[mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?

[Traian Stanev]

Cool, so when do I get a sandbox? :)

Traian


> -----Original Message-----
> From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapguide-internals-
> bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Trevor Wekel
> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:50 PM
> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
> Subject: RE: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
> 
> Yep.  Looks good.  I fixed a typo on mapguide-internals and also added a
> comment about RFC/tickets as per Bob's discussion:
> 
> "Sandboxes do not require RFC's or tickets until the code is committed to
> trunk."
> 
> No tickets, no RFC's?  That's a hackers dream come true which may help speed
> development of new features.
> 
> Thanks,
> Trevor
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapguide-internals-
> bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S
> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:10 AM
> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
> Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
> 
> I agree with Bob and Jason.
> 
> I have updated the Sandbox page to include sandbox rules (and how to get
> a sandbox).
> Also, for each sandbox, the PSC name should be listed.
> I am guessing that Bob is the assignee for the ADSK sandbox.
> 
> Regards, Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S
> 
> 
> 
> Robert Bray skrev:
> > Sandboxes are just that, a place to experiment. No need for RFC's or
> > Tickets for stuff submitted to them. However as Jason pointed out,
> > when code is promoted from Sandbox into the trunk or an official
> > branch, then RFC's and/or tickets are required.
> >
> > Bob
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > From: "Zac Spitzer" <zac.spitzer at gmail.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 9:19 AM
> > To: "MapGuide Internals Mail List" <mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org>
> > Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
> >
> >> do we need some rules/guidelines like sandbox / (commits)
> >> should be associated to a RFC or a ticket?
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Robert Bray<rbray at robertbray.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Yes - that's a good idea too. Rather than have a Sandbox Keeper, we
> >>> could
> >>> just allow any developer with commit rights to create one. They would
> >>> however be responsible for maintaining the information on the Wiki that
> >>> describes the sandbox.
> >>>
> >>> --------------------------------------------------
> >>> From: "Zac Spitzer" <zac.spitzer at gmail.com>
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 1:03 AM
> >>> To: "MapGuide Internals Mail List" <mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org>
> >>> Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
> >>>
> >>>> and maybe a wiki page explaining each sandbox and it's
> >>>> purpose/developers?
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Robert Bray<rbray at robertbray.net>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Should we appoint someone as the "sandbox" king? That person would be
> >>>>> responsible for looking after requests for setting up sandboxes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Bob
> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> From: "Jason Birch" <Jason.Birch at nanaimo.ca>
> >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 10:05 AM
> >>>>> To: "MapGuide Internals Mail List"
> >>>>> <mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org>
> >>>>> Subject: RE: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Cool.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> My first request on this one is setting up a sandbox for Haris to
> >>>>>> work
> >>>>>> on
> >>>>>> the MGRest stuff.  Given that he has commit rights, I'll leave
> >>>>>> this up
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>> him to set up.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Jason
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>> From: Robert Bray
> >>>>>> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 7:43 PM
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion RE Sandbox access?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 Bob - I think that is all of us with no objections and/or
> >>>>>> approval,
> >>>>>> so
> >>>>>> motion passed. No need to resubmit as no one objects.
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
> >>>>>> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> >>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
> >>>>> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> >>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Zac Spitzer -
> >>>> http://zacster.blogspot.com
> >>>> +61 405 847 168
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
> >>>> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> >>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> mapguide-internals mailing list
> >>> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Zac Spitzer -
> >> http://zacster.blogspot.com
> >> +61 405 847 168
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> mapguide-internals mailing list
> >> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mapguide-internals mailing list
> > mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals