[mapguide-internals]
RE: PATCH: Raster stability fixes, ticket #462
Walt Welton-Lair
walt.welton-lair at autodesk.com
Fri Mar 27 11:11:22 EDT 2009
The memory patch (mapguide_raster_unalloc.5.patch) looks good, and I'll submit that.
The stability patch (mapguide_raster_stability.patch) looks reasonable, but I'd like another 1 or 2 people to also look at it. It's significant since it limits MapGuide to processing one raster stylization request at a time, but I guess that's better than having a dead lock. Anyone know where the thread-unsafe code actually is? Is it in the provider itself? Can the mutex be moved closer to the actual thread-unsafe code?
Walt
-----Original Message-----
From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 3:10 AM
To: mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: [mapguide-internals] PATCH: Raster stability fixes, ticket #462
Hi,
Haris has been working on the raster stability problem against MapGuide 2.0.2. I was having the same problems, and was able to duplicate on 2.1. I have worked with Haris to create patches against trunk that address a couple of the problems and increase stability immensely.
Could someone please review the patches attached to:
http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/ticket/462
and commit them to trunk if appropriate?
My feeling is that the connection management stuff may need some additional work, since limiting the connection pool to 1 for single-threaded providers doesn't appear to have the desired effect. However, getting both of these patches into 2.1 would at least improve stability for Raster users.
Jason_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
More information about the mapguide-internals
mailing list