[mapguide-internals] RE: Recent submissions by UV

[Jason Birch]

That timeline works for me OK.  I hope to be able to produce a built tonight
for some testing.
I'll title it RC for now; since we were planning on pushing the Beta to
Release status if possible, it's better described as an RC anyway.

Jason

2009/9/21 Trevor Wekel <trevor_wekel at otxsystems.com>

> Hi Jason,
>
> Since the latest test build contained Fusion trunk, we could say that it
> has already been released to the community.  We are bending the rules a bit
> but I am ok with calling it RC1.  Since RFC 60 needs official review, I
> think we should defer it to MGOS 2.2.
>
> Will this work for an MGOS 2.1 timeline given that the MGOS code base has
> already been released and service packed "elsewhere"?
>
> - This week MGOS 2.1 RC1
> - Week of October 19th MGOS 2.1 Final Release.  Note: The RC1 build may
> simply be promoted to Final Release if no showstopper defects are found.
>
> I would also like to start producing MGOS 2.2 Beta builds ASAP.  I think it
> would be good to target October 9th as the date for the first MGOS 2.2 Beta.
>
>
> I should have RFC 60 reverted in an hour or so.
>
> Thanks,
> Trevor
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:
> mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
> Sent: September 21, 2009 2:13 PM
> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
> Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Recent submissions by UV
>
> Although I was of the same thought initially, I don' think we can count on
> a
> Fusion release.  My current thought is to release a 2.1 RC with Fusion
> trunk.  I hope to be able to get this built today.
>
> Jason
>
> 2009/9/21 Andy Morsell <amorsell at spatialgis.com>
>
> > Regarding the release decision: before we make a decision I think that we
> > need a date estimate on the Fusion update.  I am in the "release only
> when
> > Fusion is updated" camp, but I also agree that if we wait much longer
> then
> > we are going to have a mutiny on our hands.  Also, if RFC 60 is not
> > included, what exactly is the impact on the general user community?
> >
> > Andy
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Trevor Wekel [mailto:trevor_wekel at otxsystems.com]
> > Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 9:48 AM
> > To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
> > Subject: [mapguide-internals] RE: Recent submissions by UV
> >
> > UV's commit rights were granted under the assumption that he would commit
> > only to the sandbox.  Personally I am disappointed in what has happened
> > whether it was accidental or otherwise.  I  can perform the cleanup work
> if
> > that is what we want to do.
> >
> > I think we need to make the call ASAP as to what is going into the
> release.
> > Some members of the community are telling us to ship it now, some would
> > like
> > to see RFC 60 implemented, and some would like a Fusion update.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Trevor
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> > [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Tom
> > Fukushima
> > Sent: September 21, 2009 9:49 AM
> > To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
> > Subject: [mapguide-internals] RE: Recent submissions by UV
> >
> > In order to reduce the amount of work that might be required to clean
> this
> > up, I have removed UV's commit rights for now, but will add them again
> once
> > we get this cleared up.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> > [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Bruce
> > Dechant
> > Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 9:41 AM
> > To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
> > Subject: [mapguide-internals] Recent submissions by UV
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I thought UV was only supposed to make submissions to his RFC60 sandbox
> > that
> > was just created.
> > He has just made several submissions to branch/2.1 and not sandbox - some
> > of
> > the submissions are RFC60 related and others are not.
> >
> > Have these submissions been code reviewed? I don't see a trac ticket for
> > any
> > of the submissions.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bruce
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mapguide-internals mailing list
> > mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
> > _______________________________________________
> > mapguide-internals mailing list
> > mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mapguide-internals mailing list
> > mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
> >
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>