[mapguide-internals] RE: Recent submissions by UV

[Paul Spencer]

I'll talk to Mike about taking the current trunk version of fusion  
over to the 2.0 branch and starting with a 2.0 beta 1 release.   
Hopefully this will happen tomorrow.

Cheers

Paul

On 2009-09-21, at 4:49 PM, Trevor Wekel wrote:

> Hi Jason,
>
> Since the latest test build contained Fusion trunk, we could say  
> that it has already been released to the community.  We are bending  
> the rules a bit but I am ok with calling it RC1.  Since RFC 60 needs  
> official review, I think we should defer it to MGOS 2.2.
>
> Will this work for an MGOS 2.1 timeline given that the MGOS code  
> base has already been released and service packed "elsewhere"?
>
> - This week MGOS 2.1 RC1
> - Week of October 19th MGOS 2.1 Final Release.  Note: The RC1 build  
> may simply be promoted to Final Release if no showstopper defects  
> are found.
>
> I would also like to start producing MGOS 2.2 Beta builds ASAP.  I  
> think it would be good to target October 9th as the date for the  
> first MGOS 2.2 Beta.
>
>
> I should have RFC 60 reverted in an hour or so.
>
> Thanks,
> Trevor
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapguide- 
> internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
> Sent: September 21, 2009 2:13 PM
> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
> Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Recent submissions by UV
>
> Although I was of the same thought initially, I don' think we can  
> count on a
> Fusion release.  My current thought is to release a 2.1 RC with Fusion
> trunk.  I hope to be able to get this built today.
>
> Jason
>
> 2009/9/21 Andy Morsell <amorsell at spatialgis.com>
>
>> Regarding the release decision: before we make a decision I think  
>> that we
>> need a date estimate on the Fusion update.  I am in the "release  
>> only when
>> Fusion is updated" camp, but I also agree that if we wait much  
>> longer then
>> we are going to have a mutiny on our hands.  Also, if RFC 60 is not
>> included, what exactly is the impact on the general user community?
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Trevor Wekel [mailto:trevor_wekel at otxsystems.com]
>> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 9:48 AM
>> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
>> Subject: [mapguide-internals] RE: Recent submissions by UV
>>
>> UV's commit rights were granted under the assumption that he would  
>> commit
>> only to the sandbox.  Personally I am disappointed in what has  
>> happened
>> whether it was accidental or otherwise.  I  can perform the cleanup  
>> work if
>> that is what we want to do.
>>
>> I think we need to make the call ASAP as to what is going into the  
>> release.
>> Some members of the community are telling us to ship it now, some  
>> would
>> like
>> to see RFC 60 implemented, and some would like a Fusion update.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Trevor
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>> [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Tom
>> Fukushima
>> Sent: September 21, 2009 9:49 AM
>> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
>> Subject: [mapguide-internals] RE: Recent submissions by UV
>>
>> In order to reduce the amount of work that might be required to  
>> clean this
>> up, I have removed UV's commit rights for now, but will add them  
>> again once
>> we get this cleared up.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>> [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of  
>> Bruce
>> Dechant
>> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 9:41 AM
>> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
>> Subject: [mapguide-internals] Recent submissions by UV
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I thought UV was only supposed to make submissions to his RFC60  
>> sandbox
>> that
>> was just created.
>> He has just made several submissions to branch/2.1 and not sandbox  
>> - some
>> of
>> the submissions are RFC60 related and others are not.
>>
>> Have these submissions been code reviewed? I don't see a trac  
>> ticket for
>> any
>> of the submissions.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bruce
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals


__________________________________________

    Paul Spencer
    Chief Technology Officer
    DM Solutions Group Inc
    http://research.dmsolutions.ca/