[mapguide-internals] RE: Recent submissions by UV

[Mike Adair]

It would be helpful to know which bugs are critical to be fixed for the 
release.  There is a long list there now and I don't see them all 
getting fixed soon so if we can get the most important ones marked as 
P1, we can tackle those first.

Mike

Paul Spencer wrote:
> I'll talk to Mike about taking the current trunk version of fusion 
> over to the 2.0 branch and starting with a 2.0 beta 1 release.  
> Hopefully this will happen tomorrow.
>
> Cheers
>
> Paul
>
> On 2009-09-21, at 4:49 PM, Trevor Wekel wrote:
>
>> Hi Jason,
>>
>> Since the latest test build contained Fusion trunk, we could say that 
>> it has already been released to the community.  We are bending the 
>> rules a bit but I am ok with calling it RC1.  Since RFC 60 needs 
>> official review, I think we should defer it to MGOS 2.2.
>>
>> Will this work for an MGOS 2.1 timeline given that the MGOS code base 
>> has already been released and service packed "elsewhere"?
>>
>> - This week MGOS 2.1 RC1
>> - Week of October 19th MGOS 2.1 Final Release.  Note: The RC1 build 
>> may simply be promoted to Final Release if no showstopper defects are 
>> found.
>>
>> I would also like to start producing MGOS 2.2 Beta builds ASAP.  I 
>> think it would be good to target October 9th as the date for the 
>> first MGOS 2.2 Beta.
>>
>>
>> I should have RFC 60 reverted in an hour or so.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Trevor
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org 
>> [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of 
>> Jason Birch
>> Sent: September 21, 2009 2:13 PM
>> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
>> Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] RE: Recent submissions by UV
>>
>> Although I was of the same thought initially, I don' think we can 
>> count on a
>> Fusion release.  My current thought is to release a 2.1 RC with Fusion
>> trunk.  I hope to be able to get this built today.
>>
>> Jason
>>
>> 2009/9/21 Andy Morsell <amorsell at spatialgis.com>
>>
>>> Regarding the release decision: before we make a decision I think 
>>> that we
>>> need a date estimate on the Fusion update.  I am in the "release 
>>> only when
>>> Fusion is updated" camp, but I also agree that if we wait much 
>>> longer then
>>> we are going to have a mutiny on our hands.  Also, if RFC 60 is not
>>> included, what exactly is the impact on the general user community?
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Trevor Wekel [mailto:trevor_wekel at otxsystems.com]
>>> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 9:48 AM
>>> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
>>> Subject: [mapguide-internals] RE: Recent submissions by UV
>>>
>>> UV's commit rights were granted under the assumption that he would 
>>> commit
>>> only to the sandbox.  Personally I am disappointed in what has happened
>>> whether it was accidental or otherwise.  I  can perform the cleanup 
>>> work if
>>> that is what we want to do.
>>>
>>> I think we need to make the call ASAP as to what is going into the 
>>> release.
>>> Some members of the community are telling us to ship it now, some would
>>> like
>>> to see RFC 60 implemented, and some would like a Fusion update.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Trevor
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>>> [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Tom
>>> Fukushima
>>> Sent: September 21, 2009 9:49 AM
>>> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
>>> Subject: [mapguide-internals] RE: Recent submissions by UV
>>>
>>> In order to reduce the amount of work that might be required to 
>>> clean this
>>> up, I have removed UV's commit rights for now, but will add them 
>>> again once
>>> we get this cleared up.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>>> [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Bruce
>>> Dechant
>>> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 9:41 AM
>>> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
>>> Subject: [mapguide-internals] Recent submissions by UV
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I thought UV was only supposed to make submissions to his RFC60 sandbox
>>> that
>>> was just created.
>>> He has just made several submissions to branch/2.1 and not sandbox - 
>>> some
>>> of
>>> the submissions are RFC60 related and others are not.
>>>
>>> Have these submissions been code reviewed? I don't see a trac ticket 
>>> for
>>> any
>>> of the submissions.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Bruce
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>>> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>
>
> __________________________________________
>
>    Paul Spencer
>    Chief Technology Officer
>    DM Solutions Group Inc
>    http://research.dmsolutions.ca/
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>

-- 
   Michael Adair
   Senior Software Architect
   DM Solutions Group Inc.

   Office: (613) 565-5056 x26
   madair at dmsolutions.ca
   http://www.dmsolutions.ca
   http://research.dmsolutions.ca