[mapguide-internals] Inclusion of ArcSDE Provider

[Jason Birch]

Hmm.  Not so much confident I guess as reducing variables.  It would be
great if the build process were more flexible for sure.  If your builds
could be the official FDO builds, that would be awesome; no chance of
difference between them and the SDK.

I don't know what the answer for ArcSDE is; if we don't have access to the
ESRI SDK, then we're kind-of stuck.

I think it would make sense to ask for a fix release on fdo-internals if
there is something we need for MapGuide release.

Jason

On 22 July 2010 14:23, Trevor Wekel wrote:

> I can rollback to FDO 3.5 RC1 if you feel more confident with officially
> released binaries.
>
> At some point, I was planning to take on the official open source builds
> for FDO.  This would give MapGuide a little more freedom to incorporate FDO
> fixes as they become available.  I already have Win32, Win64, and CentOS5 32
> bit builds created from branches/3.5 last week.  I think the only provider I
> am missing is ArcSDE.
>
> I believe http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/ticket/1382 will require at least
> a build fix for the PostgreSQL and PostGIS Providers on Linux so we will
> need another build of FDO before the final release.
>
> Would you like me to move this discussion to fdo-internals?
>
>