[mapguide-internals] RE: Motion Vote: RFC 95 - OGC WMS 1.3.0 support

[Bruce Dechant]

That is a typo - I can correct the RFC :)

I believe ProcessBoundingBoxAxes() is internal and not published API.

If I have assumed wrong then you are absolutely correct - I'll let Arthur comment on that.

Thanks,
Bruce

-----Original Message-----
From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Trevor Wekel
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 10:30 AM
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: [mapguide-internals] RE: Motion Vote: RFC 95 - OGC WMS 1.3.0 support

Hi Bruce,

I have a couple of notes on the RFC:

INT32 MgCoordinateSystem::GetQuadrant (int32 nVendor) should be changed to INT32 MgCoordinateSystem::GetQuadrant (INT32 nVendor) if it is published API.  "int32" is not a SWIG supported type.

Is "static void ProcessBoundingBoxAxes(REFSTRING bbox);" intended to be published API?  Static methods and REFSTRING are not supported for published (SWIG generated) APIs.

Otherwise, +1.

Regards,
Trevor

-----Original Message-----
From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Dechant
Sent: June 21, 2010 10:12 AM
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: [mapguide-internals] Motion Vote: RFC 95 - OGC WMS 1.3.0 support

Hi all,



With the review of RFC 95 finished I would like to call for a vote.



RFC 95 - OGC WMS 1.3.0 support



Link: http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/MapGuideRfc95





+1 Bruce


Thanks,
Bruce
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals