[mapguide-internals] RFC 90 Meta Tiling Support

[Jason Birch]

The sandbox doesn't necessarily need to be tied to an RFC.

Although the proper procedure should be followed in the future, I'm happy to
retroactively approve the creation of the sandbox once the description email
is sent.  Our SVN churns enough without having to delete / recreate that
branch :)

It would be good to get the RFC into discussion/approval before too much
work is done so we can ensure that the approach is acceptable.  Wouldn't
want to have to re-do substantial parts or (as a project) to lose this
contribution.

Jason


On 26 March 2010 09:27, Trevor Wekel  wrote:

> Hello UV,
>
> I have been having offline discussions with Zac regarding Meta Tiling
> Support.  I do implicitly support this RFC because of the potential
> performance improvements.
>
> Did I miss something?  I see that a draft RFC has been posted and a new
> RFC90 sandbox has been created.  I do not recall see a posting to
> mapguide-internals stating that you are
> a) Working on meta tiling support
> b) Going to create an RFC
> c) Requesting a Sandbox
>
> The Sandbox rules are clearly posted on
> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/Sandboxes.  Sandboxes must be
> requested.
>
> It is great that you are contributing to the MapGuide project.  We
> definitely need more developers in the community.  Please keep in mind that
> all developers have to play by the rules.
>
> If a sandbox for RFC 90 was officially requested on mapguide-internals,
> please disregard this email.
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Trevor
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>
>