[mapguide-internals] /branches root directory reserved only for
trevor_wekel at otxsystems.com
Mon May 3 11:31:23 EDT 2010
Hmm... Branches should match the structure under trunk. I am personally ok with having Tools out of sync with MgDev and Installer. We should probably add a compatibility section to the wiki somewhere.
/branches/2.1/Tools (whatever version 2.1 means for each of the tools, not in sync with MgDev and Installer)
/branches/2.1/MgDev (version 2.1 for MapGuide Server and Web Extensions)
/branches/2.1/Installer (installer for version 2.1 of MapGuide)
From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
Sent: May 3, 2010 9:17 AM
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] /branches root directory reserved only for MapGuide?
Maestro versions don't normally match MapGuide versions, and are on a
different release cycle. I personally feel that it would make more
sense to have distinct Maestro branches than to place them within
existing MapGuide branches.
On 2010-05-03, Trevor Wekel <trevor_wekel at otxsystems.com> wrote:
> I'm ok with using the existing branching mechanism. The branches should
> match the trunk layout.
> (Just add Tools/Maestro)
> (At some point we should set this branch up. Was hoping to get RFC 90 in
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jason
> Sent: May 3, 2010 3:00 AM
> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
> Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] /branches root directory reserved only for
> I think we discussed this when we were initially bringing Maestro in.
> It was a while back, but I think the intention was to just use a
> prefix for the Maestro branches (/branches/Maestro-2.1, etc...)
> similar to how its done in tags.
> On 2010-05-03, Jackie Ng <jumpinjackie at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> I'd like to make a "2.1" branch for Maestro since I plan to do some
>> API changes/enhancements/overhauls post-2.1
>> Can I put a 2.1 branch under the top-level "branches" svn directory? Or
>> this only for MapGuide's use?
>> - Jackie
>> View this message in context:
>> Sent from the MapGuide Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
mapguide-internals mailing list
mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
More information about the mapguide-internals