[mapguide-internals] /branches root directory reserved only for MapGuide?

Trevor Wekel trevor_wekel at otxsystems.com
Mon May 3 11:31:23 EDT 2010


Hmm... Branches should match the structure under trunk.  I am personally ok with having Tools out of sync with MgDev and Installer.  We should probably add a compatibility section to the wiki somewhere.

/branches/2.1/Tools (whatever version 2.1 means for each of the tools, not in sync with MgDev and Installer)
/branches/2.1/MgDev (version 2.1 for MapGuide Server and Web Extensions)
/branches/2.1/Installer (installer for version 2.1 of MapGuide)
 
Trevor

-----Original Message-----
From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
Sent: May 3, 2010 9:17 AM
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] /branches root directory reserved only for MapGuide?

Maestro versions don't normally match MapGuide versions, and are on a
different release cycle. I personally feel that it would make more
sense to have distinct Maestro branches than to place them within
existing MapGuide branches.

On 2010-05-03, Trevor Wekel <trevor_wekel at otxsystems.com> wrote:
> I'm ok with using the existing branching mechanism. The branches should
> match the trunk layout.
>
> /branches/2.1/Tools/Maestro
> (Just add Tools/Maestro)
>
> /branches/2.2/Installer
> /branches/2.2/MgDev
> (At some point we should set this branch up.  Was hoping to get RFC 90 in
> first)
>
> Regards,
> Trevor
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jason
> Birch
> Sent: May 3, 2010 3:00 AM
> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
> Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] /branches root directory reserved only for
> MapGuide?
>
> I think we discussed this when we were initially bringing Maestro in.
>
> It was a while back, but I think the intention was to just use a
> prefix for the Maestro branches (/branches/Maestro-2.1, etc...)
> similar to how its done in tags.
>
> On 2010-05-03, Jackie Ng <jumpinjackie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I'd like to make a "2.1" branch for Maestro since I plan to do some
>> massive
>> API changes/enhancements/overhauls post-2.1
>>
>> Can I put a 2.1 branch under the top-level "branches" svn directory? Or
>> is
>> this only for MapGuide's use?
>>
>> - Jackie
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/branches-root-directory-reserved-only-for-MapGuide-tp4996834p4996834.html
>> Sent from the MapGuide Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>
>
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals



More information about the mapguide-internals mailing list