[mapguide-internals] improving the tilecache storage mechanism
with an addtional one
traian.stanev at autodesk.com
Tue May 4 10:13:50 EDT 2010
A tangential question: what is the advantage of BerkeleyDb over SQLite?
From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Zac Spitzer
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 7:39 AM
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: [mapguide-internals] improving the tilecache storage mechanism with an addtional one
One issue i have found at many client sites is that big tile caches
tend to be not very backup friendly.
I do love being able to use http exposed tile cache, but I think there's
some benefit in also supporting a sqllite or similiar storage mechanism
as opposed to millions and millions of tiny image files.
I was chatting to trevor about this and he suggested using Berkely for this
one big file (or one per scale) is much more managable for our
Solution Architect / Director
Ennoble Consultancy Australia
+61 405 847 168
mapguide-internals mailing list
mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
More information about the mapguide-internals