[mapguide-internals] Re: Participation in FOSS4G WMS Shoot-out

[Zac Spitzer]

knowing what the weakness's are is a good thing IMHO

while i think sql lite blows SDF & SHP out of the water,
i have found that SDF and SHP do seem to be pretty
equivalent in performance

i have a couple of linode servers available if we wanted to
setup a test bed and give it a whirl, all the data is available

what exactly is our WMS status, in terms of versions supported
and standards compliance versus latest standards?

z


On 15 May 2010 02:39, Jason Birch <jason at jasonbirch.com> wrote:
> I'd love to see this happen, but I don't think we have the resources to
> dedicate to participating or to fixing any issues that were highlighted,
> which would be even more important.
>
> I have a feeling that this benchmark would expose considerable weaknesses in
> MapGuide, some of which we care about (raster stability), others not so much
> (shapefile performance), and things like our lack of SLD or newer WMS
> version support may mean that we can't even participate even if we wanted
> to.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Jason
>
> On 13 May 2010 12:20, Daniel Morissette wrote:
>
>> No response or comment? I understand that the project may not have the
>> interest or resources to participate, in this case can we at least get a
>> formal "no we can't do it" from the PSC?
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>



-- 
Zac Spitzer
Solution Architect / Director
Ennoble Consultancy Australia
http://www.ennoble.com.au
http://zacster.blogspot.com
+61 405 847 168