[mapguide-internals] Participation in FOSS4G WMS Shoot-out

Trevor Wekel trevor_wekel at otxsystems.com
Mon May 24 12:25:15 EDT 2010

I think we will go with 32 bit.

I also found another link which seems to provide additional information on the WMS shootout setup http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_Benchmark.  Looks like Ubuntu 9.10 might be a better fit.  It makes PostgreSQL easier to set up and we may be able to install Mapserver on the same machine.  Mapserver with fcgi was a bit faster than GeoServer at last year's shootout http://www.slideshare.net/gatewaygeomatics.com/wms-performance-shootout.


-----Original Message-----
From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Zac Spitzer
Sent: May 22, 2010 1:32 AM
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] Participation in FOSS4G WMS Shoot-out

Are we using 64 bit or 32 bit?

Looking forward to the collaboration

Jason, from what I saw at foss4g last year none of the tests looked much
beyond what we can do in a layer

On 22 May 2010 11:20, "Jason Birch" <jason at jasonbirch.com> wrote:


Sounds like between us we should be able to put in a showing. I don't
think we need a vote for this, but if we do I'll register my +1.

I wonder if we'll be limited by MapGuide's restriction of WMS to
layers (not maps). Will have to take a look at what's required.


On 2010-05-21, Bruce Dechant <bruce.dechant at autodesk.com> wrote:
> I too will be available to assis...
mapguide-internals mailing list
mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org

More information about the mapguide-internals mailing list