[mapguide-internals] Motion Vote: RFC 119 - Enhance URL information in vector layer definition

Sam Wang Sam.Wang at autodesk.com
Tue Aug 2 23:37:36 EDT 2011


Hi Zac,

Existing layer definition will remove original url field, and replace it with a urlData field(complex type with four fields) as described in the RFC and backward compatibility will be kept. So there is no duplicated fields.
And also I think  tooltip is not  the same as "Url Description",  tooltip for a feature can be something entirely unrelated to the URL assigned to the feature.

Thanks,
Sam
-----Original Message-----
From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Zac Spitzer
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 11:06 AM
To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] Re: Motion Vote: RFC 119 - Enhance URL information in vector layer definition

Thanks Sam,

that makes more sense now, given that this would be in part duplicating the existing tooltip and url fields, wouldn't it be simpler to just add tooltipOverride and urlOverride, i.e still use the existing fields ?

z


On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Sam Wang <Sam.Wang at autodesk.com> wrote:
> Hi Zac,
>
> I added a sample definition XML and explains how it should work.
>
> Thanks,
> Sam
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org 
> [mailto:mapguide-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Zac 
> Spitzer
> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 9:44 AM
> To: MapGuide Internals Mail List
> Subject: Re: [mapguide-internals] Re: Motion Vote: RFC 119 - Enhance 
> URL information in vector layer definition
>
> -1 Zac
>
> RFC ought to include an example usage of the the new functionality, to solve the problem described in the Motivation section.
>
> i.e. a sample of what a new layer definition XML would look like, once a clear example is provided and I can understand it, I am happy to review my vote.
>
> z
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Jackie Ng <jumpinjackie at gmail.com> wrote:
>> +0 Jackie
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/Motion-Vote-RFC-119-Enhance-UR
>> L -information-in-vector-layer-definition-tp6645313p6647008.html
>> Sent from the MapGuide Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-internals mailing list
>> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Zac Spitzer
> Solution Architect / Director
> Ennoble Consultancy Australia
> http://www.ennoble.com.au
> http://zacster.blogspot.com
> +61 405 847 168
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-internals mailing list
> mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals
>
>



--
Zac Spitzer
Solution Architect / Director
Ennoble Consultancy Australia
http://www.ennoble.com.au
http://zacster.blogspot.com
+61 405 847 168
_______________________________________________
mapguide-internals mailing list
mapguide-internals at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-internals


More information about the mapguide-internals mailing list