[mapguide-users] RE: Guestion about speedup mapguide,
diferent domainname to mapagent.fcgi.
Jonathon
jmatpat at yahoo.ca
Wed Feb 28 23:34:47 EST 2007
Hi Kencana,
I had a look at your site and agree that the performance is a lacking. I
also don't know what your source is (SHP etc) but I have definitely found
that the attributes attached make a huge difference (I started stripping out
any data-it goes into a SQL Server database that I index as much as I can-
in my shape dbfs that I don't use for tooltips and it helps a lot). I also
use tooltips and labels as sparingly as possible (if you can, allow the user
to select the item to get attribute info). It seems that there is a lot of
information showing in the initial map view...can you remove some of the
layers or thin the data, this helps.
Hope that some of this might help...
Cheers,
Jonathon
-----Original Message-----
From: mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Kencana
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 6:44 PM
To: mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: [mapguide-users] RE: Guestion about speedup mapguide, diferent
domainname to mapagent.fcgi.
Hi,
the following is the url of my map. you can see that the map loading is very
slow.
by the way i am not using map tiled as because the map tiled initial view
took longer time than the other one.
any idea of improving it?
http://202.172.177.8/mapguide/mapviewerajax/?WEBLAYOUT=Library://Web/YP%20SG
%20Trial.WebLayout&LOCALE=en
Thank you very much
Regards,
Kencana
JasonBirch wrote:
>
> Paul wrote:
>
>> m1.google.com
>> m2.google.com
>> m3.google.com
>> and that each of these resolves to the same IP.
>
> And that IP address is probably a load balancer... I'm pretty sure
> that this single IP thing is not part of the performance measures.
>
> Traian wrote:
>
>> But then I decided that this can be worked around by using a file
>> system mount from the web server to the server where the tiles are.
>> I've seen a similar thing done on Linux/Apache, not sure if Windows
>> could handle such a setup.
>
> I've done this with IIS (CIFS share) and, while I can confirm that it
> works, it's a pain to set up and the performance is very poor compared
> to local filesystem access.
>
> While this might be a good solution for some situations (like, where
> the tile servers are behind a firewall?), I think that it would be
> best to also have the option of being able to set up a local webserver
> on the tile servers to serve the tiles directly to the clients rather
> than having to do everything through the web tier server.
>
> Jason
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-users mailing list
> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Guestion-about-speedup-mapguide%2C-diferent-domainname
-to-mapagent.fcgi.-tf3307731s16610.html#a9242845
Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
mapguide-users mailing list
mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
More information about the mapguide-users
mailing list