[mapguide-users] Mapguide 2.0 Beta1 vs 1.2 performance
Zac Spitzer
zac.spitzer at gmail.com
Wed Nov 21 03:22:22 EST 2007
sounds like fusion ain't hitting the tile cache???
On Nov 21, 2007 6:44 PM, Bruno Scott <bscott at geomapgis.com> wrote:
>
> I have 2 identical vm-ware with windows 2003 running on the same machine
> I start one of the vm-ware, I do the testing, I stop it and then start the
> other to do the other bench Bench is done on the sheboygan sample at 1:5000
> scale
>
> MG 2.0 with fusion Mg 2.0 without fusion Mg 1.2
>
> pan 29 sec 12 sec 2 sec
>
> select 28 sec 12 sec 2 sec
>
>
> I know it's only a beta but why is that slow?
>
> Bruno Scott
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Mapguide-2.0-Beta1-vs-1.2-performance-tf4848550s16610.html#a13872479
> Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-users mailing list
> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>
--
Zac Spitzer
http://zacster.blogspot.com/
+61 405 847 168 (aussie moible)
More information about the mapguide-users
mailing list