[mapguide-users] Mapguide 2.0 Beta1 vs 1.2 performance

[Paul Spencer]

It uses the mapdefinition that is set in the application definition,  
if its a tiled map then it should be tiled in the client, otherwise it  
should be a regular old map draw.

Has anyone else got feedback on this?  I saw fusion running on a  
laptop yesterday, not tiled, full screen, and it was milliseconds  
(<500ms) to pan/zoom (didn't look at select).

Paul

On 21-Nov-07, at 3:22 AM, Zac Spitzer wrote:

> sounds like fusion ain't hitting the tile cache???
>
> On Nov 21, 2007 6:44 PM, Bruno Scott <bscott at geomapgis.com> wrote:
>>
>> I have 2 identical vm-ware with windows 2003 running on the same  
>> machine
>> I start one of the vm-ware, I do the testing, I stop it and then  
>> start the
>> other to do the other bench Bench is done on the sheboygan sample  
>> at 1:5000
>> scale
>>
>>        MG 2.0 with fusion              Mg 2.0 without  
>> fusion           Mg 1.2
>>
>> pan     29 sec                  12 sec                          2 sec
>>
>> select  28 sec                  12 sec                          2 sec
>>
>>
>> I know it's only a beta but why is that slow?
>>
>> Bruno Scott
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Mapguide-2.0-Beta1-vs-1.2-performance-tf4848550s16610.html#a13872479
>> Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-users mailing list
>> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Zac Spitzer
> http://zacster.blogspot.com/
> +61 405 847 168 (aussie moible)
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-users mailing list
> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users