[mapguide-users] map refresh timeout

Jonathan Manafi jonathan.manafi at cctechnol.com
Wed Feb 27 12:41:58 EST 2008


No, the server never does recover from the leak. There was a time or two 
where I saw the process itself drop down to using 45 MB of memory or so, 
but the total commit charge in Task Manager was still saying 2031M/3938M 
or something like that.  But, for the most part, the server process 
stays at a memory usage level of around 1GB.


Zac Spitzer wrote:
> Does the server recover from the memory leak or do you need to restart
> the server?
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Jonathan Manafi
> <jonathan.manafi at cctechnol.com> wrote:
>   
>> I have narrowed it down to 2 of our layers, where when they are
>>  available, the ajax viewer seems to hang at small zooms, or there
>>  becomes a horrendous memory leak, where the smaller the scale becomes,
>>  the more memory is consumed by mgserver.exe. The most I witnessed turned
>>  out to be around 1.2 GB of memory consumed.  With these two layers off,
>>  I can zoom down to 1:.001 with no problems. Both of these layers have
>>  line styles, and one has a single label at a particular zoom level, but
>>  they are both sparse compared to a couple of other layers that have
>>  multiple line styles and/or labels.  All of our data being applied is
>>  .SDF files.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  Traian Stanev wrote:
>>  > Try identifying which layer causes the slow down, by selectively turning off layers. Then see what's peculiar about the layer -- does it have a line style, or perhaps labeling. There is a known issue around that (layers with lots of labels at high zoom), which will be fixed very soon.
>>  >
>>  > Traian
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >> -----Original Message-----
>>  >> From: mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapguide-users-
>>  >> bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Manafi
>>  >> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:54 PM
>>  >> To: MapGuide Users Mail List
>>  >> Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] map refresh timeout
>>  >>
>>  >> As an update:
>>  >>
>>  >> We began testing our data upgrading to MGOS 2.0 RC4 without using the
>>  >> fusion library, and we are noticing the same issues. The AGG renderer
>>  >> actually causes mgserver.exe to lock up at small zoom scales; today it
>>  >> happened at 1:254, whereas the GD renderer has yet to lock up, but it
>>  >> still takes a good period of time to update the map extents. Compared
>>  >> to
>>  >> MGOS 1.2 with the same dataset, both renderers perform worse when
>>  >> zoomed
>>  >> to a small scale, where, otherwise, they take only split seconds to
>>  >> update when zoomed far out.
>>  >>
>>  >> Has anyone seen this behavior with their data, as this could be a
>>  >> necessary function for our clients?
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >> J Manafi wrote:
>>  >>
>>  >>> I have experienced extremely long refresh rates when the zoom scale
>>  >>>
>>  >> is really
>>  >>
>>  >>> low (~1:33 or so). The time it takes to refresh for the Sheboygan
>>  >>>
>>  >> example is
>>  >>
>>  >>> at least 10x normal, and on a custom map, MapGuide server pretty much
>>  >>>
>>  >> hangs
>>  >>
>>  >>> at ~1:236 (currently sitting and waiting). Has anyone else noticed
>>  >>>
>>  >> this
>>  >>
>>  >>> behavior at low scales?
>>  >>>
>>  >>>
>>  >> _______________________________________________
>>  >> mapguide-users mailing list
>>  >> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>  >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>>  >>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  mapguide-users mailing list
>>  mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>  http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapguide-users/attachments/20080227/31e4b2ba/attachment.html


More information about the mapguide-users mailing list