[mapguide-users] map refresh timeout
Jonathan Manafi
jonathan.manafi at cctechnol.com
Wed Feb 27 12:41:58 EST 2008
No, the server never does recover from the leak. There was a time or two
where I saw the process itself drop down to using 45 MB of memory or so,
but the total commit charge in Task Manager was still saying 2031M/3938M
or something like that. But, for the most part, the server process
stays at a memory usage level of around 1GB.
Zac Spitzer wrote:
> Does the server recover from the memory leak or do you need to restart
> the server?
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Jonathan Manafi
> <jonathan.manafi at cctechnol.com> wrote:
>
>> I have narrowed it down to 2 of our layers, where when they are
>> available, the ajax viewer seems to hang at small zooms, or there
>> becomes a horrendous memory leak, where the smaller the scale becomes,
>> the more memory is consumed by mgserver.exe. The most I witnessed turned
>> out to be around 1.2 GB of memory consumed. With these two layers off,
>> I can zoom down to 1:.001 with no problems. Both of these layers have
>> line styles, and one has a single label at a particular zoom level, but
>> they are both sparse compared to a couple of other layers that have
>> multiple line styles and/or labels. All of our data being applied is
>> .SDF files.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Traian Stanev wrote:
>> > Try identifying which layer causes the slow down, by selectively turning off layers. Then see what's peculiar about the layer -- does it have a line style, or perhaps labeling. There is a known issue around that (layers with lots of labels at high zoom), which will be fixed very soon.
>> >
>> > Traian
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: mapguide-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapguide-users-
>> >> bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Manafi
>> >> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:54 PM
>> >> To: MapGuide Users Mail List
>> >> Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] map refresh timeout
>> >>
>> >> As an update:
>> >>
>> >> We began testing our data upgrading to MGOS 2.0 RC4 without using the
>> >> fusion library, and we are noticing the same issues. The AGG renderer
>> >> actually causes mgserver.exe to lock up at small zoom scales; today it
>> >> happened at 1:254, whereas the GD renderer has yet to lock up, but it
>> >> still takes a good period of time to update the map extents. Compared
>> >> to
>> >> MGOS 1.2 with the same dataset, both renderers perform worse when
>> >> zoomed
>> >> to a small scale, where, otherwise, they take only split seconds to
>> >> update when zoomed far out.
>> >>
>> >> Has anyone seen this behavior with their data, as this could be a
>> >> necessary function for our clients?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> J Manafi wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> I have experienced extremely long refresh rates when the zoom scale
>> >>>
>> >> is really
>> >>
>> >>> low (~1:33 or so). The time it takes to refresh for the Sheboygan
>> >>>
>> >> example is
>> >>
>> >>> at least 10x normal, and on a custom map, MapGuide server pretty much
>> >>>
>> >> hangs
>> >>
>> >>> at ~1:236 (currently sitting and waiting). Has anyone else noticed
>> >>>
>> >> this
>> >>
>> >>> behavior at low scales?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> mapguide-users mailing list
>> >> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
>> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>> >>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapguide-users mailing list
>> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapguide-users/attachments/20080227/31e4b2ba/attachment.html
More information about the mapguide-users
mailing list