[mapguide-users] Re: Join Problem

[Zac Spitzer]

i'm not sure if the 2.2 you tried was a debug build...

i am just another user of mapguide afterall!

there was some fdo fixes for bad data in fdo 3.5 which might
affect things a little tho

2.2 should definately be more stable than 1.1

refresh my memory about which fdo providers your using?



On 3 May 2010 23:56, _Jon_ <jrizzo at langan.com> wrote:
>
> I don't notice a significant performance drop from 1.1 to 2.2.  The
> performance seems about the same between those two versions.  When I was
> testing 2.1, I noticed a significant performance improvement over 1.1, but
> that improvement disappeared in 2.2.  However, the joins were not being
> computed properly in 2.1, so that might account for the difference.
>
> I haven't fully assembled my site in 2.2, but I was able to migrate one
> layer to verify that the joins are working.
> Here are the results of the profiler from that layer on my 1.1 site:
> Identity fetching:00:00.046
> Runtime layer creation:00:00.046
> Rendering scales:00:01.391
>
> Here are the results from the same layer in 2.2:
> Identity fetching:00:00.593
> Runtime layer creation:00:00.796
> Scalerange [0 : 125]:00:00.406
> Rendering scales:00:03.266
>
>
> Rendering time is one thing - if someone needs to wait an extra second or
> two for the page to load, that's not a big deal.  The slow performance is
> most problematic when selecting the joined features.  There is a noticeable
> delay between when a feature is selected and when the system responds to the
> selection.  In 2.1, there was almost no delay.  In both 1.1 and 2.2, there
> is a delay.  Granted, the delay is a bit better in 2.2 than it was in 1.1,
> but it is not nearly as good as it was in 2.1.
>
> Are you suggesting, based on what you know of the current state of 2.2 vs.
> 1.1, that I will likely see better & more stable results from 2.2 in its
> current form than I am seeing in 1.1?  I'm a bit nervous about that, but I
> do have occasional stability issues with 1.1 that I would like to fix.  This
> is a relatively low-traffic site, but it would still be a headache if it
> blows up.
>
> Thanks for the advice!
>
> Jon
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/Join-Problem-tp4946935p4997889.html
> Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-users mailing list
> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
>



-- 
Zac Spitzer
Solution Architect / Director
Ennoble Consultancy Australia
http://www.ennoble.com.au
http://zacster.blogspot.com
+61 405 847 168