[mapguide-users] Re: DWF layers look good in Design Review but out of whack in MapGuide

[frosty1_4me]

>From my experience, anything to do with DWF's if bad news.  If your dwgs are
just dummy line work, I would still move them to an SDF even without the db
need.  SDF's are much easier to update with little issues, and are much
faster than DWF's.

DWF's are horribly slow, creating them in Autocad and using load procedures
to update the layers in Studio is always combersome imo.  At least with an
SDF you can remove the manual interaction of updating the sdf.  Just my two
cents.

--
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/DWF-layers-look-good-in-Design-Review-but-out-of-whack-in-MapGuide-tp7047678p7087814.html
Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.