[mapguide-users] Re: DWF layers look good in Design Review but out of whack in MapGuide

[Johnnie GIS]

I would tend to mirror these thoughts and try to set up automated procedures to convert the DWGs. 

Regards,
Jonathon McIntyre
i-Open Technologies
Twitter: @JohnnieGIS
www.i-opentech.com
(C) 778-549-8382

Sent from my iPhone, please excuse any typos.

On Dec 12, 2011, at 1:28 PM, frosty1_4me <kbowman at cityofgp.com> wrote:

>> From my experience, anything to do with DWF's if bad news.  If your dwgs are
> just dummy line work, I would still move them to an SDF even without the db
> need.  SDF's are much easier to update with little issues, and are much
> faster than DWF's.
> 
> DWF's are horribly slow, creating them in Autocad and using load procedures
> to update the layers in Studio is always combersome imo.  At least with an
> SDF you can remove the manual interaction of updating the sdf.  Just my two
> cents.
> 
> --
> View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/DWF-layers-look-good-in-Design-Review-but-out-of-whack-in-MapGuide-tp7047678p7087814.html
> Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-users mailing list
> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users