[mapguide-users] Shapefile with 200+ fields

[Scott Hameister]

Is it necessary two have 200 fields in a SHP file? Normally at that point
you are better with a spatial database

On Aug 25, 2016 6:56 PM, "BMason" <masonb12 at telus.net> wrote:

> Hello,  I have a polygon shapefile with 200+ fields.  Most fields are
> empty.
> When selecting one polygon to view using the selection panel in mapguide,
> it is too slow to be of any use.   Is there a limitation with mapguide and
> shapefile fields?   Is using REST a better option? If so, is there any
> documentation to help us implement it?   thankyou
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.
> nabble.com/Shapefile-with-200-fields-tp5282394.html
> Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> mapguide-users mailing list
> mapguide-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapguide-users/attachments/20160825/1aa85a53/attachment.html>