[mapguide-psc] RFC process...

[Jason Birch]

There I go, asking you to keep arguing and then walking away (sorry, got busy).
 
I've put up a revision of the RFC portion of the OSGeo PSC page here.  I started from the current official text, and then modified to be kindler and gentler, but also keeping some rigidity in the process (we need to set direction).  Please treat this as a straw man and beat, reshape, etc.
 
http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/MapGuide_RFC_Process <http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/MapGuide_RFC_Process> 
 
I'm wondering if it wouldn't be a bad idea to adopt more of a casual conversational tone on the entire PSC page, or maybe split the RFC process out into its own page.  Right now the PSC page reads like a process document, which isn't bad but it's not really all that friendly either.  Maybe we need two faces.
 
I've also done some minor reformatting on a bunch of the MapGuide pages on the Wiki, and added some verbiage on how to create new RFC pages.  Please feel free to revert/change if you don't like:
 
http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/MapGuide_RFCs
 
http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/MapGuide_RFC_Template
 
http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/MapGuide_PSC <http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/MapGuide_PSC> 
 
Are we meeting on Thus?
 
Jason
 

________________________________

From: Paul Spencer
Sent: Sun 2006-10-29 7:18 PM
To: psc at mapguide.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [mapguide-psc] RFC process...



Ok, ok ... I'll keep arguing ... ;)


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 5318 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapguide_psc/attachments/20061031/1c76c4e9/attachment.bin