[mapguide-psc] RFC process...

[Robert Bray]

Jason,

This mostly looks good. However I would like the PSC document to remain 
fairly rigid because in essence that document represents our by-laws. 
How about if we take this softer, kinder, gentler documentation and put 
it on a separate How to Create an RFC page that will provide links to 
the templates and the existing/previous RFCs?

Bob

Jason Birch wrote:
> There I go, asking you to keep arguing and then walking away (sorry, got busy).
>  
> I've put up a revision of the RFC portion of the OSGeo PSC page here.  I started from the current official text, and then modified to be kindler and gentler, but also keeping some rigidity in the process (we need to set direction).  Please treat this as a straw man and beat, reshape, etc.
>  
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/MapGuide_RFC_Process <http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/MapGuide_RFC_Process> 
>  
> I'm wondering if it wouldn't be a bad idea to adopt more of a casual conversational tone on the entire PSC page, or maybe split the RFC process out into its own page.  Right now the PSC page reads like a process document, which isn't bad but it's not really all that friendly either.  Maybe we need two faces.
>  
> I've also done some minor reformatting on a bunch of the MapGuide pages on the Wiki, and added some verbiage on how to create new RFC pages.  Please feel free to revert/change if you don't like:
>  
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/MapGuide_RFCs
>  
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/MapGuide_RFC_Template
>  
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/MapGuide_PSC <http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/MapGuide_PSC> 
>  
> Are we meeting on Thus?
>  
> Jason
>  
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Paul Spencer
> Sent: Sun 2006-10-29 7:18 PM
> To: psc at mapguide.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [mapguide-psc] RFC process...
>
>
>
> Ok, ok ... I'll keep arguing ... ;)
>
>
>