[Mapserver-dev] FCGI & Database Failure
Frank Warmerdam
warmerdam at pobox.com
Tue Oct 19 16:48:23 EDT 2004
Paul Ramsey wrote:
> Now that we have FCGI, we have database connections that can persist for
> quite a while.
>
> This means that the issue of in-process database failure is no longer
> one we can ignore.
>
> So, for every connectiontype that is doing connection pooling, there
> needs to be a test right after the connection is obtained from the pool
> of "is this connection any good?". And then something useful has to be
> done if it is not. What should that useful thing be?
> (a) try to reestablish the connection?
> (b) shut down the whole process and let someone else clean up the mess?
> (c) punt on this layer, but let other layers try and finish their work?
Paul,
Well, dramatic death (ie (b)) would ensure that a clean fast cgi process
gets started and it would go through the normal processes to acquire a new
connection for the next request. This approach provides for guaranteed
self-cleanup as long as you are willing to have occational map requests fail.
What sorts of situations are you trying to deal with? A case where the
database was restarted while the fastcgi was running?
If we want to pursue (a), we would need some manner of letting the low
level pooling API know that an existing handle is no longer valid and needs
to be flushed from the pool. I think this is the most desirable approach
if we want to do a nice clean job.
> This brings up the general case of database/layer failure, which is what
> is the correct behavior in the case of failed data sources? Should we be
> dying with prejudice, or trying to let the layers that *do* work finish
> their jobs?
My personal opinion would be to die dramatically when something goes wrong,
with the possible exception of when we are depending on remote web services
(like cascaded WMS layers) where we might well expect things to be lossy.
But then I hate being fooled into thinking something wrong has succeeded than
I worry about having stuff blow up in front of me. I may have a "developer
bias" on this. If we are going to die dramatically, of course it behooves
us to explain as well as possible what has gone wrong so diagnosing the
problems isn't as hard as it often is with MapServer.
Best regards,
--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Programmer for Rent
More information about the mapserver-dev
mailing list