Revised 4.8 release plan

[Ed McNierney]

Steve -

I'm just about to test your new code from last night, but I used the
same syntax Perry's reporting and I had no problem.

	- Ed 

-----Original Message-----
From: UMN MapServer Developers List [mailto:MAPSERVER-DEV at LISTS.UMN.EDU]
On Behalf Of Steve Lime
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 12:01 PM
To: MAPSERVER-DEV at LISTS.UMN.EDU
Subject: Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-DEV] Revised 4.8 release plan

This new code really shouldn't impact that style definition. I have to
look into it though.
Did that work prior to the new addition?

Steve

>>> "Pericles S. Nacionales" <naci0002 at umn.edu> 12/15/05 10:07 AM >>>
Steve,

LAYER
TYPE POLYGON
TRANSPARENCY ALPHA
...
CLASS
  STYLE
    COLOR 128 128 128
    ANTIALIAS TRUE   # <-- this causes a segfault 
  END
END

When the ANTIALIAS keyword is added in the same style used to define
polygon fill, a segfault occurs.  Is this supposed to work or should an
error be generated for this?

-Perry

On Wednesday 14 December 2005 22:45, Steve Lime wrote:
> Hi Guys: I've made progress and committed a fix for the bug Ed found 
> with polygon outlines tonite so basic fuzzy brushes work pretty 
> nicely. That said, I really think we should have a beta3 and release 
> the first week in January. We should get good feedback with that new 
> feature so "beta" status makes sense. Besides getting these brushes in

> the right spots, I'd like to try and figure out this crash Sean is 
> seeing with free'ing dynamically created styles, plus I have one other

> bug to fix with rotating pixmap symbols.
>
> Just my opinion.
>
> Steve
>
> >>> Daniel Morissette <dmorissette at DMSOLUTIONS.CA> 12/14/05 8:56 AM 
> >>> >>>
>
> Steve Lime wrote:
> > Why don't you give me until tomorrow evening and I'll report back.
>
> Sounds good then. We'll wait to hear back from you.
>
> Daniel

--
Pericles S. Nacionales
Conservation Biology Program
University of Minnesota
e-mail: naci0002 at umn.edu