4.6.0 final today
Daniel Morissette
dmorissette at DMSOLUTIONS.CA
Tue Jun 14 13:30:13 EDT 2005
Paul Ramsey wrote:
> Gah. :) When it comes to standards, releasing broken things is really
> catastrophic to the ecology of technology. (Speaking as someone who has
> a client.) It makes things look randomly broken, even when the client
> software is good. I am in a huge MUM rush, it is going to be hard to
> make time to DL mapbrowser and try this out, but will try.
We've been walking towards this release for almost two months now, it's
a bit late to bring this up now at a few hours from the final release.
Are there bugs documenting those issues?
> If there *is*
> a problem, I would suggest that delay is better than broken standards
> support.
>
I guess I'd submit this to a vote of the other developers (I have CC'd
mapserver-dev to get other developer's opinions). My personal vote goes
to NOT delaying the release and including the fix in 4.6.1 (assuming
there is an issue).
Daniel
> Daniel Morissette wrote:
>
>> Paul Ramsey wrote:
>>
>>> Daniel,
>>> Has the 4.6 WFS support been tested with a WFS client like Cadcorp
>>> SIS or something else with reasonable GML support? We have thus far
>>> failed to be able to consume Mapserver 4.6. While we have no reason
>>> to blame mapserver (it could easily be our fault) in general
>>> mapserver WFS does not get tested as heavily as the WMS, so it would
>>> be nice to have another data point that indicates that our problem is
>>> in fact our fault, and not Mapservers.
>>
>>
>>
>> You're right that MapServer's WFS doesn't get tested as much as the
>> WMS with 3rd-party clients, simply because WFS is not as widely used
>> as WMS. We know that Tom and Bart (CC'd on this reply) use it a lot,
>> so they may be able to comment on the testing they've done.
>> Unfortunately I don't think there is much we'll be able to do on WFS
>> before the 4.6 release if we want it out today, so if any fixes are
>> required they would have to wait for 4.6.1 (and after MUM3).
>>
>> BTW, have you tried testing it with Cadcorp Mapbrowser? How did it go?
>> I think we've used MapServer with it succesfully in the past, but
>> maybe some recent changes broke something?
>>
>> Daniel
>
>
>
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Morissette dmorissette at dmsolutions.ca
DM Solutions Group http://www.dmsolutions.ca/
------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the mapserver-dev
mailing list