Mapserver WFS versus Geoserver WFS wrt namespaces
Bart van den Eijnden
bartvde at XS4ALL.NL
Sun Oct 30 04:32:44 EST 2005
Hi list,
I have been working a bit with Geoserver WFS lately, and one of the
things that strikes me is that the handling of typenames is different.
In Mapserver a typename is advertized as (note without the namespace,
although it is defined in the MAP file):
<FeatureType>
<Name>acn</Name>
<Title>ACN</Title>
<SRS>EPSG:28992</SRS>
<LatLongBoundingBox minx="4.78998" miny="52.4714" maxx="4.93471"
maxy="52.5414"/>
</FeatureType>
In Geoserver, all typenames have a namespace (but there can be more
typenames within a WFS instance), so e.g.:
<FeatureType>
<Name>rwsagi:ADRLOC</Name>
<Title>adreslocaties</Title>
<Abstract>Generated from gazetteer</Abstract>
<Keywords>ADRLOC gazetteer</Keywords>
<SRS>EPSG:28992</SRS>
<LatLongBoundingBox minx="2.0" miny="52.0" maxx="6.0" maxy="56.0"/>
</FeatureType>
Would it not make more sense to use the same approach in Mapserver WFS,
i.e. use the namespace in front of the typename?
Best regards,
Bart
More information about the mapserver-dev
mailing list