Recommended version of SWIG for building mapscript

[Tamas Szekeres]

Apologies, i was not remember correctly that 1.3.26 was the sucking
version and 1.3.27 1.3.28 1.3.29 seems to be good for C#. It was also
tested with 1.3.25 and might be compilable but i would not suggest
using this one for the C# bindings.

Tamas


2006/8/23, Tamas Szekeres <szekerest at gmail.com>:
> The C# interface is considered as being compatible with SWIG 1.3.27 and 1.3.29.
> SWIG 1.3.28 was cancelled early by the SWIG developers after reporting
> that mapscript C# is not compilable with it :)
> I can see that maintaining the backward compatibility with the various
> SWIG versions is more than a big deal and may require many defines
> within the interface files.
>
> Tamas
>
>
> 2006/8/23, Umberto Nicoletti <umberto.nicoletti at gmail.com>:
> > Devs,
> > do we have a recommended swig version?
> >
> > I am still using 1.3.21 but that seems not to be what is used to build MS4W.
> > Versions of swig greater than 1.3.24 break the java tests because of a
> > new way of handling enumerations. There is a quick fix for Java that
> > makes newer swig handle enumerations like in 1.3.21, but I fear this
> > will break apps of existing MS4W users.
> >
> > Maybe we should decide to adopt a common version on swig to avoid
> > these kind of issues in the future?
> >
> > Umberto
> >
>