Voting on RFC 9.

[Daniel Morissette]

Steve Lime wrote:
> So far only one +1 (me), and one +0 (Frank). I've got this ready to go into 4.9 with one more thumbs up. Anyone?
> 
> I'd like to get it committed and move on to something else.
> 

I find that the proposed mechanism may be a bit limited in what it can
do in the long run. I mean new properties would need to be created
everytime we want to add formatting options for new data types, etc.

But anyway, since the change adds some useful fonctionality, it is
localized in a single new tag in the templates and a new/better
mechanism could be added easily without breaking compatibility in the
future if needed, then I'll vote +1.

Daniel
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
  Daniel Morissette               dmorissette at dmsolutions.ca
  DM Solutions Group              http://www.dmsolutions.ca/
------------------------------------------------------------