RFC 17: Dynamic Array Sizing
Tamas Szekeres
szekerest at GMAIL.COM
Fri May 12 19:46:16 EDT 2006
Frank,
Agreed and supported :)
Is it possible to add the new items automatically on demand?
Could we use a compiler switch to revert to the statically allocated
behaviour if needed?
Tamas
-----Original Message-----
From: UMN MapServer Developers List [mailto:MAPSERVER-DEV at LISTS.UMN.EDU] On
Behalf Of Frank Warmerdam
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 8:48 PM
To: MAPSERVER-DEV at LISTS.UMN.EDU
Subject: RFC 17: Dynamic Array Sizing
Folks,
There was yet another request for a mapserver compiled with larger
sizes for one of the MS_MAX* macros on #mapserver today, and it drove
me over the edge! I flipped out!
The result is RFC 17. I propose to spend a day overhauling MapServer
to use dynamic sizing for all the important "limits" (symbols, layers,
classes and styles).
http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/development/rfc/ms-rfc-17
While it is open to discussion and ammendment, I'll accept votes even now.
I won't actually implement it till after I'm done the RFC 16 work.
I'm going RFC crazy!
I furthermore unofficially propose the next version be called
MapServer 5.0, code named "Dynamic Dodger" in honour of the alliterative
Ubuntu code names (ie. Breezy Badger, Dapper Duck).
Best regards
--
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
--
I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam,
warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush | President OSGF, http://osgeo.org
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.6/337 - Release Date: 2006.05.11.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.6/337 - Release Date: 2006.05.11.
More information about the mapserver-dev
mailing list