RFC 6 - Whatever happened to this?

[Steve Lime]

First place to start would be documenting what's been done and where the discussions
left things when the RFC was developed.

Steve

>>> Stephen Woodbridge <woodbri at SWOODBRIDGE.COM> 04/17/07 9:09 AM >>>
Steve Lime wrote:
> Frank is correct, there is something implemented (there is a
> RANGEITEM and such). Bill Binko did hint at wanting to pick this up
> again for 5.0 back when I was fishing around for a feature list.
> Hopefully he's reading this thread and can comment further.

Bill replied to me directly. He has not been working with mapserver in a 
while. I think he might be willing to talk to anyone that wants to pick 
this up, but I'm not sure we should expect him to do it at this point in 
time.

-Steve

> Steve
> 
>>>> Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam at POBOX.COM> 04/16/07 7:37 PM >>>
> On 4/17/07, Stephen Woodbridge <woodbri at swoodbridge.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Whatever happened to RFC6: Color Range Mapping of Continuous
>> Feature Values? Did this die on the vine? I seem to remember it
>> maybe got implemented but not documented or released officially. It
>> was last edited: 2005-11-10 and is status: Proposed
>> 
>> Should this be included in the Rev 5.0 plans? I was going to check
>> bug #1305, but bugzilla is down.
> 
> Steve,
> 
> I believe a version of it is implemented but not necessarily well 
> documented. I think the RFC process for this broke down due to the
> variety of ideas on how it ought to be done, exausting the proposer.
> I'm sure I was part of the problem!
> 
> I would like to see this picked back up, polished and addressed, but
> it will really require someone to take ownership.
> 
> Best regards,