exporting layers to OGC interfaces

[Paul Ramsey]

But it is what we are used to. Changing behavior is worse. I mean, I 
don't write a WMS map file and then not test it to see what capabilities 
it is advertising. So the fact that it is advertising all my layers is 
hardly a surprise.  On the other hand, "upgrading" my mapserver and 
finding that all my layers mysteriously "disappear" from my service -- 
*that* would be a surprise.

P

Daniel Morissette wrote:
> Paul Ramsey wrote:
>> In order to retain current behavior, the absence of the keyword should 
>> be equivalent to "all", and there should be a "none".
>>
> 
> I really meant to suggest that we break compatibility because the 
> current behavior is opening up everyone's data by default, which I find 
> bad.
> 
> Daniel


-- 

   Paul Ramsey
   Refractions Research
   http://www.refractions.net
   pramsey at refractions.net
   Phone: 250-383-3022
   Cell: 250-885-0632