Vote on RFC 26

Steve Lime Steve.Lime at DNR.STATE.MN.US
Mon Jul 9 13:15:21 EDT 2007


Hi all: I noticed that RFC 26 was never voted on. Looks like there was discussion about broadening changes
as opposed to those proposed (note the TRANSPARENCY => OPACITY switch has already been) made.

Dealing with making layers queryable seemed to be the last issue and there was no resolution as of 5/8 when
that thread died.

Steve

BTW One last change I'd like to see is removing the STYLE keyword in symbol files in favor of PATTERN...



More information about the mapserver-dev mailing list