Call for vote on MS-RFC-17: Dynamic allocation of symbols, layers, etc.

[Tamas Szekeres]

+1

The mappluginlayer stuff should be concretized a bit. That static
repository of the vtables would prevent from loading the same library
twice. That array should also be allocated dynamically since I don't
think we will ever have MS_MAXLAYERS number of different plugin
layers.

Best regards,

Tamas


2007/7/13, Daniel Morissette <dmorissette at mapgears.com>:
> I would like to call for a vote to adopt MS-RFC-17 Dynamic Allocation of
> layers, styles, classes and symbols for implementation in MapServer 5.0:
>
> http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/development/rfc/ms-rfc-17
>
> I open the vote with my +1.
>
> Note: Based on feedback from Frank and Umberto, it doesn't seem that the
> potential backwards compatibility issue related to bypassing the
> insert/add methods in SWIG MapScript is still current, so I have moved
> this item out of the "backwards compatibility section" of RFC-17.
> However I kept it for reference in the "Questions from the review
> period" at the end of the RFC.
>
> Daniel
> --
> Daniel Morissette
> http://www.mapgears.com/
>