Vote on RFC 31?

[Jeff McKenna]

I'm +0 on this, since I may not fully understand its benefits as much as 
everyone else (but I can imagine the benefits of a single function for 
each object).

jeff



Steve Lime wrote:
> Hi all: I'd like to call for a vote on RFC 31. I updated the RFC to try and deal with the points raised. The most significant addition was more elaboration on security related to URL parameter setting. I propose a URLCONFIG parameter addition to the webObj that has dual purposes, 1) to allow URL configuration and 2) to further filter the config string.
> 
> The RFC does not address writing to strings as mentioned by Tamas (although I think it's a neat idea). 
> 
> Please let me know if there are additional concerns, suggestions or clarifications necessary.
> 
> Steve (I'm +1 BTW)
>