PSC Member Nomination

[Frank Warmerdam]

Steve Lime wrote:
> Frank, I concur with your responses (good questions Arnulf). I was planning to reinvigorate
> the PSC nominations discussion last night but this thread beat me to it. We need to act on these
> nominations (Umberto and Jeff to date) in a relatively timely fashion. I think we're stuck on two
> issues:
> 
>   - PSC size
>   - a nomination process when bootstrapping the PSC
> 
> Neither of those are particularly well addressed in the RFC, hence the trouble. I think once we
> get past an initial surge in membership this will work fine. Any thoughts on size?

Steve,

I'm flexible on PSC size myself.  Certainly up to a dozen is no problem.

I think the nomination process is currently clear.  Folks are nominated
for the PSC by making a motion to add them.  Then a vote follows.  It may
not be a very good process, but I think it is clear.

Best regards,
-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org