Motion to adopt MS-RFC-35 - Standards compliance enforcement

[Daniel Morissette]

Kralidis,Tom [Burlington] wrote:
> 
> Having said this, I did not realize that a -1 vote meant a veto until I re-read rfc1.  What I really meant was to vote -0.  I just hope this does not become the norm when implementing OGC standards, that's all.
> 

Hi Tom,

Can you please confirm that by this email you officially withdraw your 
-1 vote and replace it with a -0 vote?

Steve (as PSC chair),

Is it sufficient to accept Tom's modified vote and proceed or do we need 
to redo the whole vote again since (1) there was a veto and (2) the 
voting period has expired now?

Since the PSC Guidelines are not clear on that question I presume it 
will be up to you as PSC chair to decide if his vote can be changed or 
if we need to do a whole new round of votes.

Daniel
-- 
Daniel Morissette
http://www.mapgears.com/