KML output

Steve Lime Steve.Lime at DNR.STATE.MN.US
Wed Oct 3 01:10:08 EDT 2007

I was thinking along these lines (if I understand what you're
suggesting) when
I putzed with GML3 output and transformations in general. The idea was
to use
the basic, super vanilla GML 2.2 output and then use XSLT to transform
to other
stuff. The problem I ran into was that libxslt required the
untransformed DOM
representation to be resident in memory before transforming. That really
the utility of the approach with even moderately sized datasets. The
only streaming
transformation libraries are available in Java.

Or did you have something else in mind?


>>> Alessandro Pasotti <ale.pas at TISCALI.IT> 10/02/07 1:21 AM >>>
Il martedì 02 ottobre 2007, Hal Mueller ha scritto:
> I attended the BoF, and also spoke quickly with one of the Google
> gaggle the next day.

Perhaps this is a silly idea, but since we could have a family of XML
(gml, kml and gpx) do you think it is too difficult to have an abstract
renderer and some kind of decorator to produce final output?

Alessandro Pasotti
itOpen - "Open Solutions for the Net Age"
Linux User# 167502

More information about the mapserver-dev mailing list