wxs/expected/wms_cap.xml

[Kralidis,Tom [Burlington]]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: UMN MapServer Developers List 
> [mailto:MAPSERVER-DEV at LISTS.UMN.EDU] On Behalf Of Frank Warmerdam
> Sent: 22 January, 2008 11:02 PM
> To: MAPSERVER-DEV at LISTS.UMN.EDU
> Subject: [UMN_MAPSERVER-DEV] wxs/expected/wms_cap.xml
> 
> Tom / Normand,
> 
> I'm trying to run some of the wxs tests before extending them 
> for WCS 1.1.
> (well I've already started to extend them)
> 
> When I do "run_test.py wms_simple.py" I get the following 
> difference on
> wms_cap.xml:
> 
> warmerda at gdal64[259]% diff {expected,result}/wms_cap.xml
> 86c86
> <           <LegendURL width="20" height="10">
> ---
>  >           <LegendURL width="70" height="23">
> 88c88
> <              <OnlineResource 
> xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" 
> xlink:type="simple" 
> xlink:href="http://localhost/path/to/wms_simple?version=1.1.1&
amp;service=WMS&amp;request=GetLegendGraphic&amp;layer=road&amp;format=i
mage/png"/>
> ---
>  >              <OnlineResource 
> xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" 
> xlink:type="simple" 
> xlink:href="http://localhost/path/to/wms_simple?version=1.1.1&
amp;service=WMS&amp;request=GetLegendGraphic&amp;layer=road&amp;format=i
mage/png&amp;STYLE=default"/>
> 
> Are these expected changes?  I'm guessing the 
> "&amp;STYLE=default" change relates to the style default 
> changes?  What about the legend url?
> 

I get the same diff output.

These changes may be based on
http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/ticket/2435 and
http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/ticket/2437, but I will let Assefa
comment here before committing changes.

> Have either of you been running the msautotest/wxs suite 
> lately?  It seems a bit crufty.
> 

I'm using them for SOS testing (sos.map), but haven't figured out what's
the best way to test for XML POST support in SOS (and WFS for that
matter, suggestions?).  Haven't tested the others for awhile.  A
./run_test.py gives me a skip/success/fail rate of 0/141/24.

..Tom