[mapserver-dev] WFS 1.1.0 Server and lat/long axis order

[Paul Ramsey]

When the interop extension makes the data request, what form does it
use for the SRS?  "EPSG:XXXX" or "urn://blahblah"?

P

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Kralidis,Tom [Ontario]
<Tom.Kralidis at ec.gc.ca> wrote:
>
> Well, apparently (I don't have ArcMap) the interoperability extension
> ArcMap is using does _not_ allow you specify the version for WFS, so it
> grabs 1.1.0 (latest).  For WMS it allows you to specify version.
>
> We found a workaround by tacking on "version=1.0.0" to the base URL, but
> there's a greater issue at hand :)
>
> ..Tom
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>> [mailto:mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of
>> Paul Ramsey
>> Sent: Friday, 20 February 2009 15:58
>> To: Kralidis,Tom [Ontario]
>> Cc: mapserver-dev
>> Subject: Re: [mapserver-dev] WFS 1.1.0 Server and lat/long axis order
>>
>> If you do the request via WFS 1.0 does it come out correct?
>> This is exactly the tower-of-babel I predicted when I
>> starting hammering on axis ordering in WFS back in 2005.
>>
>> P.
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Kralidis,Tom [Ontario]
>> <Tom.Kralidis at ec.gc.ca> wrote:
>> >
>> > We recently stood up 5.2.1 to offer up corporate WMS, WFS,
>> WCS and SOS
>> > interfaces.
>> >
>> > We have MAP.PROJECTION set to init=epsg:4326.
>> >
>> > We don't have MAP.WEB.METADATA.wfs_srs set.
>> >
>> > We have MAP.LAYER.METADATA.PROJECTION set (to each layer's native
>> > projection)
>> >
>> > WFS 1.1.0 shows EPSG:4326 as the DefaultSRS for the FeatureType in
>> > question (probably fetching from MAP.PROJECTION?).
>> >
>> > A colleague has noticed that connecting to our endpoint using WFS
>> > 1.1.0, through ESRI ArcMap.  ArcMap renders the features flipped.
>> >
>> > Searching a bit more, we found:
>> >
>> >
>> http://n2.nabble.com/WFS-lat-lon-coordinates-switched-in-ArcGIS-td2055
>> > 07
>> > 9.html
>> >
>> > When I try in QGIS, the WFS renders fine.
>> >
>> > Anyone have suggestions?  Can WFS offer up > 1 SRS?  This would be
>> > _non-trivial_ change to the codebase.
>> >
>> > ..Tom
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > mapserver-dev mailing list
>> > mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapserver-dev mailing list
>> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
>