[mapserver-dev] Vote for MS-RFC-55: Improve control of output resolution

[Paul Spencer]

how about RESOLUTION and OUTPUTRESOLUTION where RESOLUTION would be  
DEFRESOLUTION as defined in the RFC?

Cheers

Paul

On 16-Mar-09, at 10:22 AM, Daniel Morissette wrote:

> Brent Fraser wrote:
>> How about SCREENRESOLUTION (or DISPLAYRESOLUTION) instead?
>
> The new keyword defines "the resolution for which the size/width  
> values are set in the mapfile's classes and styles", or in other  
> words the ideal default resolution for this mapfile... we need a  
> keyword that says that. This value is not necessarily related to  
> screen or display, i.e. one could create their mapfile for 300dpi  
> and set a lower resolution for use on the web, in that context,  
> SCREENRESOLUTION would be even less meaningful than DEFRESOLUTION.
>
> -- 
> Daniel Morissette
> http://www.mapgears.com/
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev


__________________________________________

    Paul Spencer
    Chief Technology Officer
    DM Solutions Group Inc
    http://research.dmsolutions.ca/