[mapserver-dev] Vote for MS-RFC-55: Improve control of output resolution

[Alan Boudreault]

+1 for these names. They are perfectly representative.

On March 16, 2009 01:29:45 pm Paul Spencer wrote:
> how about RESOLUTION and OUTPUTRESOLUTION where RESOLUTION would be
> DEFRESOLUTION as defined in the RFC?
>
> Cheers
>
> Paul
>
> On 16-Mar-09, at 10:22 AM, Daniel Morissette wrote:
> > Brent Fraser wrote:
> >> How about SCREENRESOLUTION (or DISPLAYRESOLUTION) instead?
> >
> > The new keyword defines "the resolution for which the size/width
> > values are set in the mapfile's classes and styles", or in other
> > words the ideal default resolution for this mapfile... we need a
> > keyword that says that. This value is not necessarily related to
> > screen or display, i.e. one could create their mapfile for 300dpi
> > and set a lower resolution for use on the web, in that context,
> > SCREENRESOLUTION would be even less meaningful than DEFRESOLUTION.
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Morissette
> > http://www.mapgears.com/
> > _______________________________________________
> > mapserver-dev mailing list
> > mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
>
> __________________________________________
>
>     Paul Spencer
>     Chief Technology Officer
>     DM Solutions Group Inc
>     http://research.dmsolutions.ca/
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev