[mapserver-dev] 6.0 release plan

[thomas bonfort]

Tamas,

swf should not be enabled, it isn't migrated to the new architecture.
There was a message on the users mailing list announcing this a couple
of months ago. There might be an effort to bring it up to date with
the new api, but this would probably be for a 6.x release.
regards,
thomas

On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:04, Tamas Szekeres <szekerest at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> I did some reasonable adjustments on mapserver6. I still have problems with
> swf support it doesn't seem to be updated according to the new rendering
> API.
> I also have some run time problems with the GD renderer+mapscript, I'll be
> trying to find a way to get it working this weekend.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Tamas
>
>
>
> 2010/11/13 thomas bonfort <thomas.bonfort at gmail.com>
>>
>> Toby,
>>
>> excellent news!
>> please do the update in the mapserver6 sandbox, as this is where the
>> up-to-date code is regarding the rendering api.
>> best regards,
>> thomas
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 06:49, Toby Rahilly <toby.rahilly at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> RFC-50: I think this is out for 6.0 unless those authors are still
>> >> around.
>> >>
>> >
>> > When I left the OpengGL implementation was pretty much done. Todo is
>> > 1) Updating for the changing graphics rendering API
>> > 2) Cross platform OpenGL context creation support and testing
>> >
>> > The actual rendering code is done.
>> >
>> > Jon and I think we can finish it up before the 15th and will be having
>> > a go over the weekend. If its not ready for the 6.0 feature freeze,
>> > we'll try to leave it in a good state for the next release.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Toby
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Lime, Steve D (DNR)
>> > <Steve.Lime at state.mn.us> wrote:
>> >> RFC-50: I think this is out for 6.0 unless those authors are still
>> >> around.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> RFC-52: The changes I’d like to see are relatively minor (from a coding
>> >> perspective) and are a return to a single getShape() method in
>> >> MapScript. It
>> >> will break 5.6 scripts but is simpler in the long run. I don’t know
>> >> that an
>> >> RFC is necessary but I will start a ticket and we can go from there.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> RFC-54: I think Thomas just needs to merge?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> RFC-58 – RFC-63: Are all basically complete, perhaps need docs though.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> RFC-64: Needs feedback. This may push us back a week or two depending
>> >> on
>> >> feedback. I think 6.0 is the right time to implement though given the
>> >> types
>> >> of proposed changes. They are not candidates for minor releases.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for pushing on this…
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Steve
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> From: mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>> >> [mailto:mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Tamas
>> >> Szekeres
>> >> Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 6:12 PM
>> >> To: mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> >> Subject: [mapserver-dev] 6.0 release plan
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Hi All,
>> >>
>> >> In search of my memory (and my mails) the recent plan of the 6.0
>> >> release has
>> >> been scheduled as follows:
>> >>
>> >> "Plan for a feature freeze on Nov 15th, with a little over 2 months for
>> >> betas, aiming for final release between Jan 15th and 31st"
>> >>
>> >> How do we stand with the upcoming activities in the light of this?
>> >>
>> >> I can see the following RFCs may be affected or must be scheduled:
>> >>
>> >> RFC-50 (OpenGL)
>> >> RFC-52 (One-pass query processing), we wanted to do some rework as far
>> >> as I
>> >> remember.
>> >> RFC-54 (Rendering overhaul)
>> >> RFC-58 (KML output)
>> >> RFC-62 (Additional WFS GetFeature Output Formats)
>> >> RFC-63 (OpenLayers viewer)
>> >> RFC-64 (Expression parser overhaul)
>> >>
>> >> Do we have any other plan which will be covered with an RFC soon? How
>> >> much
>> >> time the pending efforts will take to be implemented?
>> >> The 6.0 release plan document may also updated with some up to date
>> >> information if possible.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Best regards,
>> >>
>> >> Tamas
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> mapserver-dev mailing list
>> >> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
>> >>
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > mapserver-dev mailing list
>> > mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapserver-dev mailing list
>> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
>
>