[mapserver-dev] 6.0 release plan

[Tamas Szekeres]

Thomas,

I did some reasonable adjustments on mapserver6. I still have problems with
swf support it doesn't seem to be updated according to the new rendering
API.
I also have some run time problems with the GD renderer+mapscript, I'll be
trying to find a way to get it working this weekend.


Best regards,

Tamas



2010/11/13 thomas bonfort <thomas.bonfort at gmail.com>

> Toby,
>
> excellent news!
> please do the update in the mapserver6 sandbox, as this is where the
> up-to-date code is regarding the rendering api.
> best regards,
> thomas
>
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 06:49, Toby Rahilly <toby.rahilly at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> RFC-50: I think this is out for 6.0 unless those authors are still
> around.
> >>
> >
> > When I left the OpengGL implementation was pretty much done. Todo is
> > 1) Updating for the changing graphics rendering API
> > 2) Cross platform OpenGL context creation support and testing
> >
> > The actual rendering code is done.
> >
> > Jon and I think we can finish it up before the 15th and will be having
> > a go over the weekend. If its not ready for the 6.0 feature freeze,
> > we'll try to leave it in a good state for the next release.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Toby
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Lime, Steve D (DNR)
> > <Steve.Lime at state.mn.us> wrote:
> >> RFC-50: I think this is out for 6.0 unless those authors are still
> around.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> RFC-52: The changes I’d like to see are relatively minor (from a coding
> >> perspective) and are a return to a single getShape() method in
> MapScript. It
> >> will break 5.6 scripts but is simpler in the long run. I don’t know that
> an
> >> RFC is necessary but I will start a ticket and we can go from there.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> RFC-54: I think Thomas just needs to merge?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> RFC-58 – RFC-63: Are all basically complete, perhaps need docs though.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> RFC-64: Needs feedback. This may push us back a week or two depending on
> >> feedback. I think 6.0 is the right time to implement though given the
> types
> >> of proposed changes. They are not candidates for minor releases.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks for pushing on this…
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Steve
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> >> [mailto:mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Tamas
> Szekeres
> >> Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 6:12 PM
> >> To: mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> >> Subject: [mapserver-dev] 6.0 release plan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> In search of my memory (and my mails) the recent plan of the 6.0 release
> has
> >> been scheduled as follows:
> >>
> >> "Plan for a feature freeze on Nov 15th, with a little over 2 months for
> >> betas, aiming for final release between Jan 15th and 31st"
> >>
> >> How do we stand with the upcoming activities in the light of this?
> >>
> >> I can see the following RFCs may be affected or must be scheduled:
> >>
> >> RFC-50 (OpenGL)
> >> RFC-52 (One-pass query processing), we wanted to do some rework as far
> as I
> >> remember.
> >> RFC-54 (Rendering overhaul)
> >> RFC-58 (KML output)
> >> RFC-62 (Additional WFS GetFeature Output Formats)
> >> RFC-63 (OpenLayers viewer)
> >> RFC-64 (Expression parser overhaul)
> >>
> >> Do we have any other plan which will be covered with an RFC soon? How
> much
> >> time the pending efforts will take to be implemented?
> >> The 6.0 release plan document may also updated with some up to date
> >> information if possible.
> >>
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> Tamas
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> mapserver-dev mailing list
> >> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > mapserver-dev mailing list
> > mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-dev/attachments/20101113/22787ef4/attachment-0001.html