[mapserver-dev] Re: [mapserver-users] MapServer 6.0.0-rc1 release

[Frank Warmerdam]

On 11-04-29 04:35 PM, Daniel Morissette wrote:
> On 11-04-29 03:09 PM, Lime, Steve D (DNR) wrote:
>> Well, IMHO the copyright is still valid so the dates should reflect that. I
>> did some searching and discussions were all over the board, from no dates to
>> just the current year to a date range. I did see several postings by lawyers
>> that advised using a date range that included the current year. I'd vote for
>> update...
>>
>
> I'm okay with updating as well if that seems to be the best practice, and would
> add that to the release packaging howto. But what do you suggest that we update?
>
> - Update only the main README file in the source and the copyright.txt file in
> docs?
>
> - Update all source files that were modified since last release to reflect the
> year they were last modified? (and do not touch files that were not modified)

Daniel,

I think this is the reasonable, though slightly involved step if we
want to do something.

> - Update all source files, whether they were modified or not?

I feel that this would be misrepresenting our rights and should not
be done.

Overall I don't really feel that up to date copyright dates are very
valuable which is why I've stayed out of the conversation.  But if we
do it, we should be cautious not to assert rights we don't actually have.
(IMHO)

Best regards,
-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Programmer for Rent