[mapserver-dev] MS RFC 69 - Call for vote

[Stephen Woodbridge]

Yes, way cool! I came away witht e same interpertation as Steve L came 
up with below.

Very nice job, and it seems wo function extremely fast.

I like!
   -Steve W

On 3/2/2011 6:13 PM, Lime, Steve D (DNR) wrote:
> Pretty friggin’ cool. Takes a minute to get ones head around what’s
> going on. Is this interpretation correct?
>
> -Grey box indicates a cluster representing multiple types
>
> -Icon with a number indicates a cluster representing a single type
>
> -Blue dots are the points being clustered
>
> Steve
>
> *From:*mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf Of *Tamas Szekeres
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 02, 2011 3:48 PM
> *To:* Yewondwossen Assefa
> *Cc:* mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> *Subject:* Re: [mapserver-dev] MS RFC 69 - Call for vote
>
> For those who interested I've posted an example for this clustering
> addition (you can pan and zoom by using the openlayers addition):
>
> http://vbkto.dyndns.org/cgi-bin/mapserv.exe?map=cluster.map&mode=browse&template=openlayers
> <http://vbkto.dyndns.org/cgi-bin/mapserv.exe?map=cluster.map&mode=browse&template=openlayers>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Tamas
>
>
>
>
> 2011/3/2 Yewondwossen Assefa <yassefa at dmsolutions.ca
> <mailto:yassefa at dmsolutions.ca>>
>
> Sorry for the late answer. Just had a chance to look at the doc.
>
> +1
>
>
>
> On 28/02/2011 2:43 PM, Tamas Szekeres wrote:
>
>     Dear PSC,
>
>     I've tested the significant aspects (rendering, query handling, item
>     handling, expressions etc) with the implementation of MS RFC 69
>     <http://mapserver.org/development/rfc/ms-rfc-69.html> and it appears
>     to be working well. Updated the implementation code
>     <http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/attachment/ticket/3700/mapcluster.c> and
>     added a sample image
>     <http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/attachment/ticket/3700/cluster.png>
>     to the corresponding ticket
>     <http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/ticket/3700>.
>
>     With the current approach I'm plannig to include the single layer
>     option only so this provider doesn't require a specific connection
>     type. Currently I have 4 clustering parameters (including 2
>     expressions) to be exposed, so it is worth to create a new section
>     (CLUSTER) in the mapfile to configure that. See the RFC document for
>     the details.
>
>     I think this proposal is in good condition to call for a vote on it.
>
>     I start with my +1.
>
>
>     Tamas
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     mapserver-dev mailing list
>
>     mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org  <mailto:mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>
>     http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Assefa Yewondwossen
>
> Software Analyst
>
>
>
> Email:yassefa at dmsolutions.ca  <mailto:yassefa at dmsolutions.ca>
>
> http://www.dmsolutions.ca/
>
>
>
> Phone: (613) 565-5056 (ext 14)
>
> Fax:   (613) 565-0925
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev