[mapserver-dev] ticket 3153 fixed in MapServer 6.0?

[Worth Lutz]

Is this ticket http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/ticket/3153  fixed in
MapServer 6.  I am using version 6.

 

I've spent some time today tracking down a problem with changing my
resolution of my map from 72 to 300.

 

I scaled up the width and height and changed the resolution.  Defresolution
was left at the default.

 

I displayed the two maps on the screen with the same height and width.  The
two maps should have looked the same but the labels were tiny on the map
with a resolution of 300.

 

After much google searching, testing and head scratching, I finally figured
out that it was a "MAXSCALE" value in the layer in the mapfile.  The "SIZE"
was set to 7 and the "MAXSCALE" set to 7.  Removing the "MAXSCALE" value
fixed this layer.  There was no SYMBOLSCALEDENOM in this layer.  Thus this
was not a good test.

 

Now looking at another I am seeing a problem with another layer.  Layer
definition below.

 

The labels on the State Roads are good with resolution at 72 and tiny with
resolution set to 300.

 

 If I remove the three lines, SYMBOLSCALEDENOM, MAXSIZE, MINSIZE, I get
identical maps at both resolutions.

Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug I should report?

 

Worth Lutz

 

  LAYER

  NAME "highways_anno"

  GROUP "NCDOT_trans_grp"

  STATUS off

  TYPE ANNOTATION

  DATA "/data/NCDOT/shapefiles/LRS_Arcs"

  MAXSCALEDENOM 3750001

  TEMPLATE void

  CLASSITEM "rte_1_clss"

  LABELITEM "rte_1_nbr"

  SYMBOLSCALEDENOM 1000

  CLASS

    EXPRESSION "SR" # State Roads

    MAXSCALEDENOM 25001

    COLOR 0 0 0 # dummy color

    TEXT "(SR[rte_1_nbr])"

    LABEL

      BUFFER 15

      TYPE TRUETYPE

      MINFEATURESIZE 5

      MINDISTANCE 150

      POSITION auto

      ALIGN center

      ANGLE follow

      FONT vera

      ANTIALIAS true

      SIZE 11

      MAXSIZE 11

      MINSIZE 6

      COLOR 0 0 255

    END

  END

END

 

 

 

 

Worth Lutz

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-dev/attachments/20110524/5e8de228/attachment-0001.html