[mapserver-dev] RFC84 call for vote: migrate from svn/trac to git/github

Daniel Morissette dmorissette at mapgears.com
Mon Apr 2 11:18:59 EDT 2012

+1 and thank you Thomas for the hard work on this.

Side note about the RFC for those who may not have noticed that 
important detail:

- What Thomas proposes is to have mapcache and tinyows live in separate 
sub-repositories, so this means we no longer need RFC-83 which was 
proposing the opposite (i.e. a tighter integration of the source files). 
Perhaps the ref to RFC-83 in RFC-84 should be removed.

On 12-04-02 10:27 AM, thomas bonfort wrote:
> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/browser/trunk/docs/en/development/rfc/ms-rfc-84.txt
> I have updated the RFC with the discussion related to ticket history
> (which can be nearly seamlessly imported), and removed the option of
> continuing using the current trac instance.
> The target result can be found here: https://github.com/mapserver
> (still missing the msautotest and tinyows repos, and with a temporary
> ms-import one)
> Given that the discussion around this RFC has happened and that most
> of the reluctances have been sorted out, I would like to call for a
> vote on this. In case of success, trac and svn would need to be
> freezed, and we could be up and running on github by the end of the
> week.
> I'll start with my +1
> regards,
> thomas
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev

Daniel Morissette
Provider of Professional MapServer Support since 2000

More information about the mapserver-dev mailing list