[mapserver-dev] RFC 86: Call for vote

[Stephen Woodbridge]

+1 SteveW  but ...

I think the RFC needs some updating to address Jeff's issue for the doc 
team. Also re-reading the RFC I noticed that it does not specify if the 
the ranges need to be ordered or not and in the email thread you 
mentioned the there has to be a zero item as you check for that. So I 
think some additional detail, to help the doc team. This could be added 
once the code is checked in based on the final implementation.

BTW, I think this is an excellent design given all the discussion we had 
earlier on it and it will a very useful feature for users. Thanks!

On 12/12/2012 6:06 AM, thomas bonfort wrote:
> Hi guys,
> Please vote on RFC 86, scale dependent token replacements (
> http://mapserver.org/development/rfc/ms-rfc-86.html )
>
> I'll start with my +1.
>
> thanks,
> thomas
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
>